- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2018-04-05T14:43:21.000Z
This data, exported from Google Analytics displays the most popular 50 pages on Austintexas.gov based on the following: Pageviews: The total number of pages viewed. Repeated views of a single page are counted. Unique Pageviews: The number of visits during which the specified page was viewed at least once. A unique pageview is counted for each page URL + page Title combination. Average Time on Page: The average amount of time users spent viewing a specified page or screen, or set of pages or screens. Entrances: The number of times visitors entered your site through a specified page or set of pages. Bounce Rate: The percentage of single-page visits (i.e. visits in which the person left your site from the entrance page without interacting with the page). Percent Exit: (number of exits) / (number of pageviews) for the page or set of pages. It indicates how often users exit from that page or set of pages when they view the page(s).
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2018-08-02T15:07:24.000Z
** Static Data Set ** This table shows ATCEMS Performance Data for the past three fiscal years. It has been uploaded to support the ATCEMS FY2015 annual report. THE DATA IN THIS TABLE WILL NOT BE UPDATED.
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-05-01T20:38:28.000Z
A full list of the ~50 indicators the Office of Sustainability tracks to measure progress on how we are doing as an organization (the City of Austin) and the broader community.
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-12-02T23:10:01.000Z
Data collected to assess water quality conditions in the natural creeks, aquifers and lakes in the Austin area. This is raw data, provided directly from our Field Sample database (FSDB) and should be considered provisional. Data may or may not have been reviewed by project staff. Data quality (QC) flags have been provided to aid in the assessment of the data; R-flagged data should be considered suspect, but is provided as it represents taxpayer expenditure and the efforts undertaken to characterize the status of our environment. Note that some data over time will be improved and edited for accuracy and that QC flags can change based upon changes in project criteria. Additional data may be availabe from other agencies (USGS, TCEQ, LCRA) and should be requested from them directly; some of this data may appear in those datasets.
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-10-09T13:31:09.000Z
This table contains performance data related to ATCEMS revenue collection processes. When using this data for research or other purposes, please cite it as: Emergency Medical Services Department. (2017). EMS - Monthly Finance Measures [Data set]. City of Austin, Texas Open Data Portal. https://doi.org/10.26000/001.000008. Since this table is updated on a monthly basis, include the date that the table was accessed in the citation.
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-07-29T17:18:35.000Z
The 2014 Austin Digital Assessment Project was supported by the Telecommunications & Regulatory Affairs Office of the City of Austin, the Telecommunications and Information Policy Institute at the University of Texas, and faculty and graduate students from the Department of Radio, Television, and Film and the University of Texas. This dataset includes the individual survey responses. To see aggregated dataset weighted to reflect Austin demographics, refer to the attached document
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-04-03T17:12:38.000Z
** Static Data Set ** This table shows activities done by the ATCEMS Public Information Office for FY2015. It has been uploaded to support the ATCEMS FY2015 annual report. THE DATA IN THIS TABLE WILL NOT BE UPDATED.
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-09-30T21:20:44.000Z
To pursue the Austin City Council’s policies in energy efficiency, Austin Energy invests millions of dollars in these programs so our customers can benefit from lower usage and bills. Unspent Energy Efficiency Services weatherization funds for FY 2015 are now carried over into the FY 2016 budget. Customer Assistance Program weatherization assistance funds have historically been carried forward into subsequent budget years. Find more information at http://austinenergy.com/go/advantage and http://austinenergy.com/go/reports.
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-12-09T13:11:46.000Z
Flat file data set of the data found in the Austin Finance Online eCheckbook application. The data contained in this dataset is for informational purposes only and contains expenditure information for the City of Austin. Certain Austin Energy transactions have been excluded as competitive matters under Texas Government Code Section 552.133 and City Council Resolution 20051201-002; therefore, the line amounts may not reflect the total check amount if certain Austin Energy invoices were included on the check. Please visit the Austin Finance Online website for a searchable front end to this data set.
- API data.austintexas.gov | Last Updated 2019-07-29T17:28:39.000Z
The following 34 "investment packages" were derived from recommendations in Corridor Mobility Plans for the nine corridors eligible for 2016 Mobility Bond construction funding in accordance with the ballot language approved by voters in November 2016. Those corridors are: North Lamar Boulevard, Burnet Road, Airport Boulevard, East MLK Jr. Boulevard/FM969, South Lamar Boulevard, East Riverside Drive, Guadalupe Street, William Cannon Drive and Slaughter Lane. The investment packages below equal an estimated $1.4 billion in mobility, safety, and connectivity improvements across the nine corridoes. The packages underwent a comparative analysis to identify the packages that would result in the biggest bang for the buck. The packages were divided into two improvement categories: Corridor-wide Mobility Improvements and Enhanced Multimodal Improvements. Corridor-wide Mobility Improvements generally include the ‘short-term’ recommendations from the Corridor Mobility Plans. These provide improvements across all modes along the entire length of the corridors, including pavement rehabilitation, intersection improvements, traffic signal upgrades, transit signal priority, better connections to transit stops, continuous ADA-compliant sidewalks along the length of the corridor, continuous bicycle lanes or shared-use paths along the length of the corridors, and in some cases intermittent median islands for safety. Enhanced Multimodal Improvements generally include the ‘long-term’ recommendations from the Corridor Mobility Plans. While each corridor is different, and the specific improvements may vary, the Enhanced Multimodal Improvements are intended to bring each corridor up to the ultimate vision established in the Corridor Mobility Plan. These improvements build upon the Corridor-wide Mobility Improvements and add full street reconstruction, wider sidewalks, protected bicycle lanes, intermittent median islands for safety, and streetscape improvements, such as landscaping and trees. Each package has three estimated costs: low, most likely, and high. The low represents the upper limit of the cost with a 10% confidence level, the most likely a 70% confidence level, and the high a 90% confidence level. This range is due to the level of information we have right now, and is typical of infrastructure project development. City of Austin staff is proposing three approaches to funding the estimated $1.4 billion in projects: Full design and construction, Initiate Design and Possible Construction, Seek Additional Funding Opportunities. Full design and construction: Investment package will be fully funded through 2016 Mobility Bond funding and other partnership/coordination opportunities. Initiate design and possible construction: The City will start design of improvements in the investment package and the City will be seek funding and partnership opportunities to fund the project through completion. Seek additional funding opportunities: The City will seek to implement the improvements through partnership/coordination opportunities, and will seek additional funding opportunities. All recommendations are approximate, proposed, and subject to change. The exact locations of improvements will be determined in the Project Design Phase, and the City will work with the community prior to project construction.